2025

Sorcea Labs dashboards

Role

Product Designer

Timeline

1.5 months

Team

Product + Engineering + Stakeholders

My Part

End-to-end workflow design from discovery to prod

2025

Sorcea Labs dashboards

PROTECTED · NDA

Enter password to view case study

The detailed process is protected, but here is the public version. Have the passcode? Step in for the full case study.

ROLE

Product Designer

OUTCOME

A clearer, faster workflow

SCOPE

Research, product design, and prototyping

no passcode? Get in touch ✦

← BACK TO WORK

Context

The product wasn’t the most interesting part. The data was.

While raising funding for Sorcea’s B2C skincare scanner, investor and customer conversations kept surfacing the same signal: people were increasingly interested in the data powering the product.


That revealed a bigger opportunity, the data itself could become a product.

This insight led us to explore Skyn, a platform designed to make Sorcea’s skincare data accessible and turn it into actionable insights.

Foundations for creating skyn

User Identification

Contextual inquiry revealed 3 user types: Brand managers, analysts, and product stakeholders

John Doe

Skincare market analyst

Core Pain Points

  • Hard to validate a trend

  • Decision paralysis

  • Too many steps to reach a decision

32%

Trust legacy tools

2-3

Hours manual analysis

Goals - View Data, analyze trends

Contextual inquiry revealed 3 user types: Brand managers, analysts, and product stakeholders

40%

Time lost switching

5–7

Tools used

Competitive research

Data sources

Benchmark

(Spate / Trendalytics / NIQ / Circana / Launchmetrics)

Fragmented data sources

Search trends, SKU data, social

reviews, and media influence data

Multiple tools workflows

Too aesthetic and non interactive

Highly complex and mostly for data analysts

Skyn
What we can do/ are already doing

Unified sorcea collected dataset

Multiple data types + Genuine reviews and ratings

Easy to use, single tool

Actionable data visualizations

Intuitive and easy to use by everyone

Type of Data

Workflow & Usability

Data viz

Tool complexity

The platforms were also largely built for data-heavy users, with complex navigation and visualizations that added surface-level polish without helping users interpret or compare insights.

This gave us a clear direction for the MVP: one platform, one unified data source, and a much simpler path from question to insight.

MVPs

Our first instinct was to simplify the workflow with a guided wizard

We translated the most common filters from early user conversations into a multi-step flow that felt clean, structured, and easy to follow.


At this point, the assumption was simple: if we reduced complexity, the experience would work.

Testing showed that simplicity had become a constraint

The MVP was easy to follow, but the wizard was too rigid for how analysts actually worked. A tree test and early customer feedback showed they needed to move faster between demographics, combine multiple filters, manipulate data, and access raw data when necessary.


For V2, we expanded the workflow around flexibility and control, without bringing back the complexity we were trying to remove.

Open Skyn

Open Skyn

Create Project

Choose Dataset

Explore Entire Dataset

Choose filters

Drill down on filters

Explore demographics

Explore products

Quick look different views

View filtered data

Add multiple filters

Analyze trends

Analyze trends

Insights

Insights

Apply Preset Filters

Initial Workflow expectation

Remaped workflow - from query wizard to decision workspace

V2 worked — but it still wasn’t ready to ship

Users responded well to the added control, and stakeholders were comfortable moving toward launch. But deeper testing revealed a bigger issue: the product was solving for power users, not yet for a broader customer base.

That shifted the question from “Does this work?” to “Can this scale beyond expert users?”

Feedback and changes

  • Nearly two-thirds of newer users wanted major changes.

  • Around 80% expected product-level information, but our data was still organized around internal product numbers.

  • 60% missed key filters because they were buried inside dropdowns.

Product data used internal IDs, which made product-level analysis difficult.

Filters were critical

but were hidden and missed by 60% of the testers

Dev team were confused on the

functional similarity of views and filters

The global Plus Jakarta sans for data entries was moved to roboto as a more mono spaced sans

Aa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Jakarta Sans

Jakarta Sans

Aa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Gender

Age Range

City

Skin Tone

Skin Type

Filters/Preset

More control didn’t mean better insights - Critical pivot

The second MVP attempt gave users more control, but testing revealed that control alone wasn’t enough. We needed to rethink the structure, not just add features.

We needed to move from a flexible table experience to a decision workspace built around datasets, visible filters, product-level clarity, and repeatable analysis flows.

Final solution

Deep dive into data

What I did before moving ahead

What data needs viz according to our target companies?

Taking a look into our own data

What sort of trends are they analyzing?

Gender

Age

CIty

Skin Tone

Skin Type

Skin Goals

Skin Goals

Product # URL

Product # Rating

Product # Experience

Products were categorized by number instead of names an imp change to move ahead

Data that leads to company/product level decisions; like purchase trends, geographical analysis, and cost comparisons.

What SKUs are selling?

Where are they selling?

What skin profiles are buying these products?

No longer a tool but a platform!

We introduced a new visual identity and rebuilt the landing, login, and onboarding experience to better explain the value of Sorcea’s data and what users could do with it.

Feedback and changes

  • Filters had become the most-used part of the MVP, so we made them a primary part of the interface with a persistent sidebar instead of hiding them in the flow.

  • With the data now better structured, we could also introduce KPIs, sorting, grouping, and faster ways to compare datasets

  • Moderated testing also revealed that users repeatedly applied the same filter combinations. We used that behavior to rethink views as predefined categories.

Dedicated dashboard +

sidebar

Global data sampled into categorized presets

based on user activity of first click filters

KPIs for quick stats

Filters was a feature

that got the best traction

so we put them front and

center of the dashboard

The cleaner data set allowed

us to add sorting and

groupings

Gender

Age Range

City

Skin Tone

Skin Type

Filters/Preset

(Next big thing at Skyn)

Design system